Performance and Load Factors
The performance of the Mini IMP compares
favorably with other aircraft in its size and weight class.
It is similar is size and weight to several Formula One race planes and
has performance capabilities that approach that level while maintaining “pussy
cat” handling qualities, many “creature comforts”, and slow takeoff and
landing speeds.
Many inquiries are received regarding the
“gliding characteristics” of the Mini-IMP.
We have found that the Mini-IMP (at zero thrust – idle power) will
glide approximately 20 to 1. This
amounts to a rate of descent of approximately 400 feet per minute, at 90 miles
per hour.
The Mini-IMP has been designed to an
ultimate load factor of 6 g (4 g limit). This
safety margin does permit one to overload the aircraft for normal operations.
Design gross weight is 1000 pounds (500 Empty plus 500 Usable).
The structure is adequate for this weight (at the 6 g ultimate) thus for
normal operations the aircraft can be loaded over 800 pounds gross and still be
adequate for “Normal Category” operations. (such as additional fuel or
baggage). In these instances the
FAA requirement of a rate of climb ten times the stall speed (500 FPM for a 50
MPH stall speed) set the gross weight limits.
With the baggage space virtually on the Center of Gravity and with the
fuel tanks on the Center of Gravity, the Mini-IMP is not too sensitive to
various weight loadings. The trim
provision is adequate for a great range in pilot weights although it is not
adequate for the modifications required for two passengers.
The GA(PC)-1 wing section used on the Mini-IMP has a very considerable
trim change effect as the airfoil is varied for the possible flight
configuration that the pilot might desire, and a trimmable horizontal tail is
incorporated in the design to accommodate these effects.
Baggage up to 100 pounds can be easily accommodated without prohibitive
trim effects. With heavier pilots,
such baggage loads do result in longer takeoff runs before the aircraft can be
rotated, particularly with heavy fuel loads since there is no propeller
slipstream blowing over the tail surfaces to assist in “rotation” for
takeoff.
We get many inquiries regarding the
suitability of the Mini-IMP for operations from rough fields and unprepared
runways. Due to the requirement for
retracting the wheels into the wings we were unable to include larger diameter
tires on the Mini-IMP since then they could not be retracted completely so as to
give the performance we desired from low-powered engines.
These small tires do limit the “roughness” of the runways from which
the Mini-IMP can be suitably operated. The
“spring-leg” landing gear has proven to be suitable for rough area taxi
operations, but take off and landing in rough areas should be avoided.
The low taxi speed thrust available from the low-powered engines used in
the Mini-IMP do not permit taxiing over very large clumps of grass, runway
joints, etc., or getting started on uneven ground.
In order to get the desired high speed cruise capability, the compromises
in propeller selection makes the low speed thrust available for takeoff and
acceleration very limited. A large
clump of grass can effectively slow the acceleration of the Mini-IMP on takeoff
from an unprepared surface. Although,
the takeoff speed for the Mini-IMP is not nearly as high as some of the other
“mini” designs now available, we do NOT recommend the Mini-IMP for operation
from short unprepared runways.
The propeller blades are virtually stalled
during initial takeoff acceleration due to the high pitch and low RPM when using
a propeller of sufficiently high pitch to give the desired high cruise speed
possible with the design. We now
have drawings for a more costly, light-weight, controllable, all-metal propeller
suitable for the Mini-IMP which greatly assists with this problem.
This propeller also enables us to take advantage of various “turbo”
installations, which are now available for use with some of the VW conversions
etc. Thus we are able to control
these propellers to provide low pitch for taxi, takeoff, and climb, and then
control them for higher pitch for cruise, and for higher altitude operation
where the turbo let us still pull full rated sea level power from the engines.
These turbo engines are NOT to be rated at any higher power than they are
designed for (for sea level operation), but the turbo lets you maintain these
power levels at high altitude where the unassisted engine rapidly loses power as
altitude is gained. Such engines
are not “blown” but are merely “maintained”.
Do not be confused by claims that the turbocharging will increase the
power of non-turbocharged engines. While
this might be possible, it is NOT desirable to try to pull more than normal
rated power from most modified engines and thus develop more power than these
engines are rated for. Various
gearing systems are necessary to let some engines turn at higher speeds than are
suitable for propellers. Such
engine conversions must be properly designed so as to avoid exceeding the
designed engine speed limitations of the engine.
While excessively high RPM will result in more power, it also results in
a quick loss of engine life and durability.
Further, most converted engines do not have sufficient heat rejection.
The Mini-IMP design takes advantage of the
very latest state of the art. The
GA(PC)-1 airfoil is one of the most recent (and best) to come from NASA.
It was especially designed for use on aircraft of the “homebuilt”
type where the builders are relatively inexperienced, and the people who fly the
machine are usually not professionals. Thus,
things like surface smoothness are not as critical as with some other available
wing sections. Also, the flight
characteristics of an aircraft with such an airfoil section are not as demanding
as they can be with some of the so-called laminar airfoils.
The stall is exceedingly gentle, and the wing has excellent high lift
capability without the use of complicated flaps, etc.
The fuel economy and thus operational
expense of the Mini-IMP is outstanding. These
features and capabilities have been obtained through the use of new materials,
the latest airfoil, and unique design. However, these capabilities can not be retained if the design
and configuration are modified to any great extent. Any extension of capabilities (such as a two-place
arrangement) could only be realized by making the design bigger and using more
power. This would mean an entirely
new aircraft if these capabilities are to be retained in a two passenger
configuration. This also means more
weight, more structure, more complication, and more cost.